RAJESH TANDI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - 2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 240

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 240

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. PANKAJ MITHAL, MR. S.V.N. BHATTI, JJ
RAJESH TANDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Gopal Jha, Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj, Ms. Shireesha Sharma, Mr. Sawan Datta, Mr. Nimish Arjaria, Mr. Navesh Kumar
For the Respondents: Mrs. Prerna Dhall, Mr. Ambuj Swaroop, Ms. Rajnandani Kumari, Mr. Kapil Katare, Mr. Saksham Gahoi, Mr. Vishwas Sharma, Mr. Prashant Singh

Table of Content
1. court acknowledges medical necessity for bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's serious health issues necessitate medical treatment. (Para 3 , 4)
3. interim bail granted on health grounds for six months. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings.

2. The petitioner is virtually seeking bail in connection with FIR No.129 of 2025 registered with Police Station Civil Line, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The petitioner contends that he is suffering from serious illness and requires medical treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the State of Chhattisgarh has filed medical report pursuant to our last order and the status report admits that the petitioner is suffering from Perianal Abscess and Fournier Gangrene and is undergoing treatment at Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. In view of the aforesaid medical report, we enlarge the petitioner on interim bail on medical grounds for a period of six months’ from today subject to the terms and conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court commensurating with the charges, if any, framed against him.

6. The present petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

7. Pendin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document