SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 240

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. PANKAJ MITHAL, MR. S.V.N. BHATTI, JJ
RAJESH TANDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Gopal Jha, Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj, Ms. Shireesha Sharma, Mr. Sawan Datta, Mr. Nimish Arjaria, Mr. Navesh Kumar
For the Respondents: Mrs. Prerna Dhall, Mr. Ambuj Swaroop, Ms. Rajnandani Kumari, Mr. Kapil Katare, Mr. Saksham Gahoi, Mr. Vishwas Sharma, Mr. Prashant Singh

Table of Content
1. court acknowledges medical necessity for bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's serious health issues necessitate medical treatment. (Para 3 , 4)
3. interim bail granted on health grounds for six months. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORDER

2. The petitioner is virtually seeking bail in connection with FIR No.129 of 2025 registered with Police Station Civil Line, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Learned counsel for the State of Chhattisgarh has filed medical report pursuant to our last order and the status report admits that the petitioner is suffering from Perianal Abscess and Fournier Gangrene and is undergoing treatment at Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

6. The present petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top