SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 242

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Unidentified Judge, J
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
ROOP LAL – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court addresses procedural aspects related to delays and the review petition. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the court details its consideration of the application regarding listing. (Para 3 , 4)
3. the dismissal of the review petition highlights the insufficiency of the grounds proposed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORDER

1. Delay condoned.

2. Petitioners in Special Leave Petition (C) No.1007/2024 seeks review of the order dated 18th March, on the grounds urged in the review petition.

3. Application, for listing review petition in open Court, is rejected.

4. The review petition has been perused and the grounds considered.

5. We are of the considered opinion that no case for review has been set up.

6. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top