SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 244

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ
DEVKUMAR SURYAVANSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Manish Kumar Gupta, Ms. Harshita, Mr. Akash Singh, Mr. Chandan Kumar Singh, Ms. Sangita Gupta
For the Respondents: Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Mr. Kshitiz Aggarwal, Mr. Yashvardhan Shah

Table of Content
1. court's procedural context (Para 1)
2. conditions for granting bail (Para 2)
3. terms of release and cooperation (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
4. disposal of petition (Para 6)

ORDER

2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, i.e. since 16.05.2025, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. It goes without saying that the petitioner will extend all co-operation during the investigation/trial.

6. The Special Leave Petition and pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top