SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 247

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. J.B. PARDIWALA, MR. K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ
ANUJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Aditya Singh-1, AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR, Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava, Adv.

Table of Content
1. overview of the charges and trial status. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. court's discretion in granting bail. (Para 6)
3. final order regarding bail and trial. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)

ORDER

2. The investigation culminated in filing of the chargesheet for the offence enumerated above.

4. We are informed that the trial is in progress.

6. Having regard to the genesis of the occurrence and other attendant circumstances on record, we are inclined to exercise our discretion in favour of the petitioner.

8. The trial shall proceed further expeditiously in accordance with law.

10. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top