Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MANOJ MISRA, MANMOHAN, JJ
KASHMIR KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and arguments related to anticipatory bail. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's decision to grant anticipatory bail and conditions thereof. (Para 6) |
ORDER
2. The learned counsel for the State has accepted notice and is agreeable for final disposal of the special leave petition at the notice stage itself.
4. This appeal impugns order dated 24.10.2025 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh rejecting the anticipatory bail prayer of the appellant in connection with First Information Report (FIR) No.38/2025 registered at P.S. Ramdas, District Amritsar.
The said order is extracted below:
2. Leave granted.
4. This appeal arises from an order dated 24.07.2025 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh rejecting the anticipatory bail prayer of the appellant in connection with FIR No. 38/2025 registered at P.S. Ramdas, District Amritsar.
“1. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that from the allegations made in the First Information Report (“FIR”), it appears that Husband of the deceased was staying abroad (i.e. Canada) and the deceased was staying with her in-laws. The allegations are that she complained to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
