SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 252

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ
MILAN MIRI ALIAS KARRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) | Diary No.4914/2026 | CRA No. 72/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Saurabh Ajay Gupta, Mr. Ritik Gupta, Mr. Ayush Haritash
For the Respondents: Ms. Sugandha Jain, Mr. Prabodh Kumar

The court granted bail after evaluating the nature of allegations and evidence, highlighting due process in criminal proceedings.

Headnote:This petition arises from the judgment and order of the High Court of Chhattisgarh dated 12.2.2025 in Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 2024, dismissing the appeal against conviction and sentence under IPC Sections 363 and 354. The court admitted the special leave petition and granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions set by the trial court. The pivotal issue was whether the trial court's conviction was justified based on the presented evidence. The court emphasized the nature of allegations alongside evidence while deciding on bail conditions. The final decision was to release the petitioner on bail with conditions set forth by the trial court.

Table of Content
1. background of the case and previous court decisions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the conviction and sentences imposed. (Para 3)
3. final ruling regarding bail and conditions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

ORDER

1. This petition arises from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh dated 12.2.2025 in Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 2024 by which the Criminal appeal preferred by the petitioner herein against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial court came to be dismissed.

2. We take notice of the fact that the petitioner was put to trial in the Court of Special Judge (FTSC), Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh in Special Criminal Case No.36 of 2023.

3. He stood convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “the IPC ”) and was sentenced to undergo 5 years of rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- and also for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the and was sentenced to undergo 2 years of rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/-.

4. The appeal has also now been dismissed by the High Court.

5. Leave granted.

6. Having regard to the nature of the allegations and also the evidence on record, we order that the petitioner be released on bail subject to terms and conditions that the trial court may deem fit to impose.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top