Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, Ms. Divya Roy, Mr. Ruturaj Satpathy, Ms. Sneha Masani, Mr. Satyam Pahal, Ms. Ritagya Singh, Mr. Km Nataraj, Mr. Vishaka Raghuram, Mr. Anjuman Tripathy, Mr. Mohit Singh Sikarwar, Mr. Prasenjeet Mohapatra, Mr. Abhinav Jha, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Shashwat Jaiswal, Ms. Diksha Arora, Ms. Visakha Raghuram, Mr. Srisatya Mohanty, Ms. Sakshi Mittal
For the Respondent(s): Mr. R.R. Bag, Mr. Rajbeer, Mr. Venkate M.D. Muppanna, Mr. S.k. Patri, Mrs. Velasree S, Mr. A S Beniwal, Mr. Ram Bhadauria, Mr. Raveesh Kumar Tripathi, Dr. Nilakshi Choudhury, Ms. Rasmi Prava Mohanty, Mr. O.p. Yadav, Mr. Rahul Kumar Sinha, Ms. Anuja Bajpai, Mr. Robin Khokhar, Mr. Arunav Patnaik, Mr. Dhananjay Bhaskar Ray, Mr. Nirbhay Nitya Nanda, Mr. Anshuman Siddharth Nayak, Mr. Rahul Kulhare, Mr. Divya Prakash Arya, Mr. Ratnadeep Raha, Dr. Kundan Kumar, Mr. Aman Mudgal, Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Mrs. Priyanka Singh, Mr. M Aamir Faiyaz, Ms. Anushka Rajora, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Mr. Mohit Singhal, Mr. Shidhhart Shankar Jha, Ms. Kalpana Jha

Based on the provided legal document, there is no indication or requirement that the trial of a case and counter must be conducted in a single court. The document primarily pertains to an appellate decision by the Supreme Court, which dismissed the petitions and did not specify procedural requirements regarding the conduct of trials or counter-arguments in a particular court.

Generally, in the legal system, the trial of a case and the presentation of counter-arguments are conducted within the same trial court or jurisdictional level where the case is initially filed or at the appellate level if an appeal is filed. The process involves the trial court hearing the case first, and if either party is dissatisfied with the decision, they may appeal to a higher court.

The document emphasizes that the Supreme Court, exercising jurisdiction under Article 136, did not find sufficient grounds to interfere with the High Court's decision. It does not specify that the trial and counter-trial must occur in one court or in a specific manner. Therefore, based on this document, it cannot be concluded that it is mandatory to conduct trial and counter in one court.

In summary: - The document does not establish or mandate that trial and counter must be conducted in the same court. - Procedural norms generally allow for trial and appeal processes to occur in different courts, depending on the stage of the case.

(!)