SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 256

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
, CJ, MR. JOYMALYA BAGCHI, J, MR. N.V. ANJARIA, J
TEHSEEN S. POONAWALLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 754/2016 | Diary No(s). 1059/2026 (PIL-W)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, AOR, Mr. Nizam Pasha, Adv., Ms. Rashmi Singh, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR, Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.

Legal compliance in public interest actions is essential for safeguarding rights and interests.

Headnote:The present petition concerns a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, challenging the actions of the government authorities regarding public interest. The petitioner raises concerns about procedural adherence to statutory requirements, which potentially impact the legal rights of affected parties. The Court determined that adequate legal provisions were not followed, warranting a review of the existing framework for public welfare actions. The primary questions addressed included the validity of actions taken without necessary procedural safeguards. The Court held that due diligence in following legal mandates is essential for the proper governance of public interest matters. The outcome was to schedule a further hearing, emphasizing the necessity for proper legal processes.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top