2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 264
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MR. ALOK ARADHE, JJ
C/M ISHAN INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP. & ORS. – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24446/2025 | SLP(C) No. 24656/2025 | SLP(C) No. 25538/2025 | SLP(C) No. 27307-27319/2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR, Mr. Mridul Jain, Adv., Mr. V. C. Shukla, Adv., Mr. Animesh Kumar, AOR, Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv., Dr. Sumit Kumar, Adv., Ms. Aprajita, Adv., Mrs. Palak Joshi, Adv., Ms. Tanya Tanvi, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ravi Kant, Adv., Mr. Mayank Manish, Adv., Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR, Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Adv., Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv., Mr. C.p. Rajwar, Adv., Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Chaterjee, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, AOR, Dr. Rajat Rajan Singh, Adv., Ms. Pallavi Singh, Adv., Ms. Anamika Yadav, Adv., Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, AOR, Ms. Maitri Goal, Adv., Mr. Sachin Kumar Verma, Adv., Mr. Anubhav Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Rittik Pandey, Adv., Mr. Varun Ranjan, Adv., Mr. Ashok Kumar A, Adv., Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR, Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv., Ms. Priti Kumari, Adv., Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Adv., Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, AOR, Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, AOR, Mr. Yatharth Singh, Adv., Ms. Shrishti Gautam, Adv., Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR, Mr. Aryan Dev Pandey, Adv., Mr. Abhijeet Verma, Adv., Mr. Ranjan Nikhil Dharnidhar, AOR
Procedural compliance in educational matters must be rigorously assessed in light of statutory provisions.
Headnote:In this judgment, the Supreme Court considered multiple petitions arising from Special Leave to Appeal concerning educational institutions. The court examined the relevant legal provisions governing educational standards and procedural compliance, and determined that the matters require final consideration on 24.03.2026. The court permitted the parties to submit additional documentation to support their claims. The key issues presented revolve around the procedural requirements and the substantive rights of educational entities. The Court highlighted the need for thorough examination of compliance with established norms and represented that the issues articulated by the appellants warrant attention. The final outcome is a listing for final disposal on 24.03.2026, allowing for submission of supplementary documents.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. order for hearing and permissions granted. (Para 1) |
ORDER
1. List the matters for final disposal on 24.03.2026 (non-miscellaneous day)
2. The parties are permitted to file additional documents.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
