Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MANOJ MISRA, MANMOHAN, JJ
GAURAV HABLANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document content (inside
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the appellant's case and custody. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments about the appellant's eligibility for bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. outcome of the appeal granting bail. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
4. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the appellant is a young boy aged about 21 years and he has been in custody for last nearly eight months. It has also been submitted that co-accused have been admitted to bail.
6. Having regard to the nature of offences as also the tender age of the accused and the period of incarceration, we are of the view that the appellant is entitled to be released on bail, pending trial.
8. The appellant shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the trial court may deem fit to impose in the facts and circumstances of the case.
ORDER
2. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.
“7. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The order of the High Court rejecting the bail prayer of the appellant is set aside.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
