SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 271

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.K. MAHESHWARI, MANMOHAN, JJ
RAKESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, AOR, Mr. Vikash Singh, Adv., Mr. Yatharth Singh, Adv., Ms. Shrishti Gautam, Adv., Mr. Divyansh Singh, Adv.

Table of Content
1. discussion on procedural requirements for filing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. consideration of bail and suspension based on case circumstances. (Para 3)
3. conditions surrounding potential cancellation of suspension. (Para 4)

ORDER

2. Issue notice returnable in six weeks.

4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we direct that the substantive jail sentence of the petitioner be suspended and he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as may be deemed fit and imposed by the trial court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top