2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 274
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPANKAR DATTA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ
N. KARTHIKEYAN & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. – Respondent
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 53/2022
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G., Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Adv., Mr. Shovan Mishra, Adv., Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Adv., Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv., Mr. Rajbahadur Yadav, Adv., Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR, Mr. Anuj Bhandari, AOR, Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, AOR, Ms. Yashmita Pandey, Adv., Ms. G. Indira, AOR, Mr. Shivendra Singh, AOR, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi, Adv., Ms. Aryama Singh Rajput, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Sr. A.A.G., Ms. Misha Rohatgi, AOR, Mr. Nakul Mohta, Adv., Mr. Amulya Upadhyay, Adv., Mr. Ayush Kashyap, Adv., Ms. Tanvi Anand, Adv., Ms. Sommya Kashyap, Adv., Mr. Manu Srinath S., Adv., Mr. M.p.srivignesh, Adv., Mr. A. Selvin Raja, AOR, Mr. Sharavena Raghul Asr, Adv., Mr. Mithun Kumaar N, Adv., Mr. Gokul Athithya R P, Adv., Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv., Ms. Meena K Poulose, Adv., Mr. Ridhi Bose, Adv., Ms. Sampriti Bakshi, Adv., Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv., Mr. Prateek Bhatia, AOR, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv., Mr. Varun Rajawat, Adv., Mr. Mrinal Kumar Sharma, AOR
The Supreme Court emphasizes the necessity of procedural compliance and clarity in judicial processes, ensuring all parties are duly heard.
Headnote:The Supreme Court, in Writ Petition No. 53/2022, examined multiple intervention applications and exemptions related to filing original documents as per law. The petitioners sought clarifications on previous orders, asserting procedural inconsistencies. The Court evaluated these claims and directed the re-listing of the matters for future hearings. The primary legal intent centers around ensuring procedural compliance in ongoing judicial processes. The final outcome mandated that matters be re-listed on April 21, 2026.
Back
