Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.V. VISWANATHAN, VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, JJ
ARUN DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. considerations for granting bail based on time served and case status. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's decision on suspension of sentence pending appeal. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. final ruling on appeal outcomes and pending applications. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
2. Heard Mr. Chandrika Prasad Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.Surjeet Singh, learned counsel appearing on advance notice on behalf of the State.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that it is a case of fixed sentence of 5 years and the appeal in the High Court is of 2025 which is unlikely to be heard in the near future.
6. Considering the fact and circumstances and the fixed sentence that has been imposed and the period already undergone by the appellant and also the time that will be taken for hearing the appeal, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and enlarge the appellant on bail, pending disposal of the appeal before the High Court.
8. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
ORDER
2. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
