SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 277

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
SONAL KHIYANI – Appellant
Versus
RAVINDRA KHIYANI – Respondent
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 4225/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Niraj Sharma, AOR, Mr. Aviral Parashar, Adv., Ms. Mahima Sharma, Adv., Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms. Deeplaxmi M., Adv., Ms. Manreet Kaur, Adv., Mr. R. N. Keswani, AOR, Mr. Ravi Raghunath Vachher, Adv., Mr. Sunil Ramchandani, Adv., Mr. Rahul N., Adv.

Mediation is crucial in family disputes, and the obligation for interim maintenance remains enforceable.

Headnote:The Supreme Court, in this petition for special leave to appeal, emphasized the significance of mediation between the parties in a family dispute concerning two children aged 21 and 18 years. The court referred the matter to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre and directed both parties to appear. It ruled that the respondent must pay interim maintenance as per the Family Court's previous order while addressing concerns regarding remarriage.

Table of Content
1. court hears arguments on mediation. (Para 1)
2. importance of settling for children's welfare. (Para 2)
3. referral to mediation for resolution. (Para 3)
4. court orders mediation and maintenance. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
5. court addresses concerns regarding remarriage. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-wife and learned counsel for the respondent-husband, who appears on caveat.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are two children born to the parties, who are 21 years old and 18 years old and thus, it is all the more imperative that an honourable settlement is reached between the parties so as not to jeopardize their future and also to take care of the well being of the petitioner-wife for the remaining period of her life.

3. Learned counsel for the parties are agreeable to go for mediation before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre (SCMC). Accordingly, the matter is referred to the SCMC.

4. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Mediator on 10.03.2026 at 02:30 p.m. through video conferencing. Thereafter, the learned Mediator shall take a call with regard to whether their presence is required physically before him/her.

5. Learned Mediator is requested to submit a report within two months thereafter.

6. List on 23.04.2026.

7. The Court directs the respondent to pay the up-to-date interim maintenance fixed as per the order dated 08.11.2019 of the Family Court, which still holds the field, within four weeks from today.

8. On the apprehension raised by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent would remarry and the Court may grant interim stay of the order impugned granting the respondent has no intention, at present, to remarry.

9. The aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the respondent is taken on record.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top