SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 289

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MR. ALOK ARADHE, JJ
LAKSHMIBEN & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR, Mr. Siddharth Dave, Adv., Mr. Vikram Choudhary, Adv., Mr. Naveen Gaur, Adv., Mr. Kartavya Batra, Adv., Mr. Akshay Singh, Adv., Mr. Angel Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Lokesh Kumar Choudhary, AOR, Mr. Amit Yadav, Adv., Mr. Mayank Sharma, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. P. B. Velani, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR, Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR, Ms. Neha Singh, Adv., Dr. Neetu Rathore, Adv., Mr. Ronak Baid, Adv., Mr. Madhavan Srivatsan, Adv., Mr. Shashank Shekhar, AOR

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and initial orders. (Para 1)
2. modification regarding the stay on coercive actions. (Para 2)
3. conclusion directing future actions and timelines. (Para 3)

ORDER

1. This Court, on 19.09.2025, passed the following order :-

2. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

4. We also make it clear that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners pending disposal of the Writ Petitions.“

3. Re-list the matters after four weeks.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top