SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 299

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VISHAL JALINDAR AHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. The appellants apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No.367/2024, registered at Police Station Loni, District Ahmednagar for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

4. We have been informed that the appellants have joined the investigation and the chargesheet has also been filed. Thus, no custodial interrogation is required.

5. Considering the above, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and grant anticipatory bail to the appellants.

6. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set aside, and the appellants are granted anticipatory bail, subject to the terms and conditions that may be imposed by the concerned Trial Court.

7. The appeals are allowed, accordingly.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

ORDER

Leave granted.

The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top