SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 301

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CJ,
PANKAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3.The appellant apprehends his arrest, in connection with FIR No.138/2024, registered at Police Station - Model Town, District - Ludhiana for the offences punishable under Section 303 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

4. We have been informed that the appellant has joined the investigation and is cooperating with the same. Thus, no custodial interrogation is required.

5. Considering the above, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and grant anticipatory bail to the appellant.

6. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set aside, and the appellant is granted anticipatory bail, subject to the terms and conditions that may be imposed by the concerned Trial Court.

7. We make it clear that the appellant shall continue to cooperate with the investigation till its conclusion.

8. The appeal is allowed, accordingly.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

ORDER

Leave granted.

The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top