SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 304

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RAJESH KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details on the fir and charges against the appellant. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented by counsel regarding the situation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court observations regarding bail and investigation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. final ruling allowing the appeal. (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER

2. By the impugned judgment and order dated 4th August, 2025, the High Court of Judicature at Patna has rejected the appellant’s prayer for bail in anticipation of arrest.

4. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the respondents.

6. In such view of the matter and considering the nature of allegations, we are of the considered opinion that custodial interrogation of the appellant is not necessary and that there is sufficient ground for the appellant to be admitted to an order for grant of bail in anticipation of arrest.

8. It is directed that in the event of the appellant being arrested in connection with proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR, he shall be released on bail by the arresting/investigating officer/trial court on terms and conditions to be fixed by the trial court.

10. Needless to observe, the appellant shall not, directly or indirectly, b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top