Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
,
ANKIT JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lack of criminal antecedents (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. bail granted due to circumstances (Para 5) |
| 3. order for bail (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
ORDER
2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
4. We have been informed that the appellant does not have any criminal antecedents touching upon the NDPS Act. He has already been under incarceration for about 16 months and the trial has just begun.
6. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set aside and the appellant is granted bail, subject to the terms and conditions that may be imposed by the concerned Trial Court.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Leave granted.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
