SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 341

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P M PARTHAKUMAR (DIED) THROUGH HIS LRS. – Appellant
Versus
AJITH VISWANATH – Respondent


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. /2026 (@ SLP (C) NO. 6833/2022)

P M PARTHAKUMAR (DIED) THROUGH HIS LRS. APPELLANT(s)

VERSUS AJITH VISWANATH & ORS. Respondent(s)

with CIVIL APPEAL NO. /2026 (@SLP(C) No. 12932/2022)

O R D E R

1. Applications seeking substitution are allowed.

2. Leave granted.

3. Appellants challenge the judgment and orders dated 14.01.2022 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in RFA No.

466/2014.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that interest of justice would be best met with the disposal of the present Appeal on the following terms:

(i) It is not in dispute that in the earlier round of litigation, the relationship of landlord and tenant inter-se the parties in the present appeal stood settled. There is no relationship of landlord and tenant.

Signature Not Verified Digital(y siigneid b)y It is also not in dispute that in the second round of KANCHAN CHOUHAN

Date: 2026.02.16

Reason:

litigation, the respondent herein has succeeded in establishing

his title and thus held entitled to recovery of possession as has

been so held by the Trial Court.

(iii) We notice that subsequently the High

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top