JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR. vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 359

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ARJUN BISHT, CJI, JOYMALYA BAGCHI, J, N.V. ANJARIA, J
JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR, Mr. Parth Shekhar, Adv., Mr. Shubham Singh, Adv., Mr. Youkteshwari Prasad, Adv., Mr. Vijay Singh, Adv., Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Adv., Mr. Mata Prasad Pathak, Adv., Mr. Rajmani Mohanty, Adv., Mr. Kirtikar Sukul, Adv., Mr. Manoj Kumar Bansiwal, Adv., Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sravan Kumar Karanam, AOR, Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Adv., Mr. P. Venkatraju, Adv., Mr. Nagesh Sharma, Adv., Mr. Santosh Kumar Yadav, Adv., Mr. Anurag Ojha, AOR, Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala, Adv., Ms. Tanishka Grover, Adv., Mr. Harsh Tyagi, Adv., Ms. Charvi Virmani, Adv., Ms. Sreejoni Baruah, Adv., Mr. Bharat Thakorlal Manubarwala, AOR

Table of Content
1. the high court's ruling on exam answer key errors. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

1. Application (IA No.335854/2025) for impleadment is allowed. The High Court of Jharkhand through its Registrar General is ordered to be impleaded as respondent no.2A.

Cause title be amended accordingly.

2. Delay condoned.

3. Leave granted.

4. The issue that falls for consideration in the instant appeal is whether the High Court of Jharkhand, in exercise Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ARJUN BISHT Date: 2026.02.11 of its power of judicial review, rightly interfered in the Reason:

particulars of the answer key published on 13.05.2024 of the Preliminary Entrance Test held on 10.03.2024 for the recruitment of Civil Judge (Junior Division). The aforesaid preliminary examination was held pursuant to Advertisement No.22/2023 dated 14.08.2023. The High Court, through the impugned judgment, has, thus, after duly enumerating its analysis in paragraph 32 of the same, concluded in paragraph 33 that the three answers given by the appellant – Public Service Commission, question nos. 8, 74, 96 in booklet ‘A’ are incorrect. Consequently, the High Court directed that one mark be given to the candidat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 359

SUPREME COURT OF INDIAARJUN BISHT, CJI, JOYMALYA BAGCHI, J, N.V. ANJARIA, JJHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR. – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. – Respondent

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ARJUN BISHT, CJI, JOYMALYA BAGCHI, J, N.V. ANJARIA, J
JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. – Respondent