SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ARAVIND KUMAR, PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ
SAREVESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of disability due to lifestyle factors. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dismissal of appeal due to lack of merit. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORDER
2. In the instant case having perused the First Medical Report and the opinion of the Medical Board, it would leave no manner of doubt in us that the disease of “Stroke Ischemic RT MCA TERRITORY” was not attributable to service nor aggravated on account of service and we say so for the simple reason that in both the reports, it was clearly indicated that the appellant was in the habit of smoking bidis that too ten bidis per day and it is trite position of medical law that an ischemic stroke occurs when a blood clot or fatty plaque (atherosclerosis) blocks an artery leading to brain, restricting oxygen which reduces blood flow and causing brain tissue damage and the medical opinion categorizing risk factors includes high blood pressure (hypertension), smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol, i.e., dyslipidemia, obesity and atrial fibrillation. In the instant case, the Medical Review Board has clearly opined that on account of continuous smoking, the disease of “Stroke Ischemic RT MCA TERRITORY” attributable to the appellant could have occasioned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.