RAM NARESH RAWAT vs SRI ASHWINI RAY . - 2016 Supreme(Online)(SC) 840

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(Online)(SC) 840

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 771 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 25284 OF 2012 RAM NARESH RAWAT .....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS SRI ASHWINI RAY & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S)
W I T H CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 838 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 9635 OF 2013 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 858 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23985 OF 2012 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 62 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 31343 OF 2011 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 82-85 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 18245 OF 2014, 18246, 18247 &
18249 OF 2014 Signature Not Verified CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 101/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19220/2014 Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date: 2016.12.15 Reason:
CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 787/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19224/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 788/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19286/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 819/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19217/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 823/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19218/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 856/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19230/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 121-131/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 8473/2012, 19394/2012, 23980/2012,23981/2012, 23986/2012, 34868/2012, 38228/2012, 38231/2012, 38235/2012, 38236/2012, 19236/2014.
CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 735/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19278/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 793-817/2015 IN SLP(C) NO.20025/2011 AND
19396/12, SLP(C) NO. 30275/2012, SLP(C) NO. 30276/2012, SLP(C) NO. 1577/2013, SLP(C) NO. 5597/2013, SLP(C) NO. 29683/2013, SLP(C) NO.
19095/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19282/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19251/2014, SLP(C) NO. 25279/2012, SLP(C) NO. 12438/2013, SLP(C) NO. 12433/2013, SLP(C) NO.
5350/2013, SLP(C) NO. 19221/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19260/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19257/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19206/2014, SLP(C) NO.25277/2012, SLP(C) NO. 19094/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19205/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19219/2014, SLP(C) NO.
19237/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19246/2014 AND SLP(C) NO. 19255/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 215/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 21830/2012 WITH CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 216/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 21835/2012 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 512/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 18413/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 475/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 8203/2012 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 536/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19393/2012 A N D CONMT. PET. (C) NO. 106/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19292/2012
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 771 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 25284 OF 2012 RAM NARESH RAWAT .....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS SRI ASHWINI RAY & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S)
W I T H CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 838 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 9635 OF 2013 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 858 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23985 OF 2012 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 62 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 31343 OF 2011 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 82-85 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 18245 OF 2014, 18246, 18247 &
18249 OF 2014 Signature Not Verified CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 101/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19220/2014 Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date: 2016.12.15 Reason:
CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 787/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19224/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 788/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19286/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 819/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19217/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 823/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19218/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 856/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19230/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 121-131/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 8473/2012, 19394/2012, 23980/2012,23981/2012, 23986/2012, 34868/2012, 38228/2012, 38231/2012, 38235/2012, 38236/2012, 19236/2014.
CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 735/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19278/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 793-817/2015 IN SLP(C) NO.20025/2011 AND
19396/12, SLP(C) NO. 30275/2012, SLP(C) NO. 30276/2012, SLP(C) NO. 1577/2013, SLP(C) NO. 5597/2013, SLP(C) NO. 29683/2013, SLP(C) NO.
19095/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19282/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19251/2014, SLP(C) NO. 25279/2012, SLP(C) NO. 12438/2013, SLP(C) NO. 12433/2013, SLP(C) NO.
5350/2013, SLP(C) NO. 19221/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19260/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19257/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19206/2014, SLP(C) NO.25277/2012, SLP(C) NO. 19094/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19205/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19219/2014, SLP(C) NO.
19237/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19246/2014 AND SLP(C) NO. 19255/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 215/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 21830/2012 WITH CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 216/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 21835/2012 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 512/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 18413/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 475/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 8203/2012 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 536/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19393/2012 A N D CONMT. PET. (C) NO. 106/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19292/2012
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 771 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 25284 OF 2012 RAM NARESH RAWAT .....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS SRI ASHWINI RAY & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S)
W I T H CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 838 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 9635 OF 2013 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 858 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23985 OF 2012 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 62 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 31343 OF 2011 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 82-85 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 18245 OF 2014, 18246, 18247 &
18249 OF 2014 Signature Not Verified CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 101/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19220/2014 Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date: 2016.12.15 Reason:
CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 787/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19224/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 788/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19286/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 819/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19217/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 823/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19218/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 856/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19230/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 121-131/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 8473/2012, 19394/2012, 23980/2012,23981/2012, 23986/2012, 34868/2012, 38228/2012, 38231/2012, 38235/2012, 38236/2012, 19236/2014.
CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 735/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19278/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 793-817/2015 IN SLP(C) NO.20025/2011 AND
19396/12, SLP(C) NO. 30275/2012, SLP(C) NO. 30276/2012, SLP(C) NO. 1577/2013, SLP(C) NO. 5597/2013, SLP(C) NO. 29683/2013, SLP(C) NO.
19095/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19282/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19251/2014, SLP(C) NO. 25279/2012, SLP(C) NO. 12438/2013, SLP(C) NO. 12433/2013, SLP(C) NO.
5350/2013, SLP(C) NO. 19221/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19260/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19257/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19206/2014, SLP(C) NO.25277/2012, SLP(C) NO. 19094/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19205/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19219/2014, SLP(C) NO.
19237/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19246/2014 AND SLP(C) NO. 19255/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 215/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 21830/2012 WITH CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 216/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 21835/2012 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 512/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 18413/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 475/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 8203/2012 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 536/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19393/2012 A N D CONMT. PET. (C) NO. 106/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19292/2012

.............................................J.
(A.K. SIKRI)
.............................................J.
(N.V. RAMANA)
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 15, 2016.
ITEM NO.IC COURT NO.9 SECTION XV (For Judgment)
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 771/2015 In SLP(C) No. 25284/2012 RAM NARESH RAWAT Petitioner(s)
VERSUS SRI ASHWINI RAY AND ORS. Respondent(s)
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 838 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 9635 OF 2013 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 858 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23985 OF 2012 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 62 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 31343 OF 2011 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 82-85 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 18245 OF 2014, 18246, 18247 & 18249 OF 2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 101/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19220/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 787/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19224/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 788/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19286/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 819/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19217/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 823/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19218/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 856/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19230/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 121-131/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 8473/2012, 19394/2012, 23980/2012,23981/2012, 23986/2012, 34868/2012, 38228/2012, 38231/2012, 38235/2012, 38236/2012, 19236/2014.
CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 735/2015 IN SLP(C) NO. 19278/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 793-817/2015 IN SLP(C) NO.20025/2011 AND
19396/12, SLP(C) NO. 30275/2012, SLP(C) NO. 30276/2012, SLP(C) NO.
1577/2013, SLP(C) NO. 5597/2013, SLP(C) NO. 29683/2013, SLP(C) NO.
19095/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19282/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19251/2014, SLP(C)
NO. 25279/2012, SLP(C) NO. 12438/2013, SLP(C) NO. 12433/2013, SLP(C) NO. 5350/2013, SLP(C) NO. 19221/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19260/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19257/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19206/2014, SLP(C) NO.25277/2012, SLP(C) NO. 19094/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19205/2014, SLP(C) NO.
19219/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19237/2014, SLP(C) NO. 19246/2014 AND SLP(C)
NO. 19255/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 215/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 21830/2012 WITH CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 216/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 21835/2012 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 512/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 18413/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 475/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 8203/2012 CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 536/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19393/2012 A N D CONMT. PET. (C) NO. 106/2016 IN SLP(C) NO. 19292/2012 Date : 15/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.K.Mody,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Ankur Mody,Adv.
Mr. Adarsh Tripathi,Adv.
Ms. Apurva Shukla,Adv.
Mr. Amlan Kumar Ghosh,Adv.
M/s. S.M. Jadhav & Company,Adv.
Mr. B. S. Banthia,Adv.
Mr. S. K. Verma,Adv.
Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv.
Mr. Akshat Shrivastava,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Arjun Garg,Adv.
Mr. Isham Nagar,Adv.
Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv.
*******

Advocates:
AMLAN KUMAR GHOSH

JUDGMENT

A.K. SIKRI, J.

All the petitioners who have filed these contempt petitions were engaged by the State of Madhya Pradesh on different dates on different posts but all of them were engaged as daily wagers. They continued as daily wagers for long spell of time. According to the petitioners, in terms of Madhya Pradesh Industrial Environment (Standing Order) Rules, 1963, they became entitled to be classified as 'permanent employees'. However, their demand for classification as permanent employees was not acceded to by the State, which inaction of the State Government provoked some of these employees to raise the industrial dispute for their classification which resulted into award(s) of the labour court directing their classification as 'permanent'. The labour court also held that on their classification as permanent, they would be entitled to the pay-scale of permanent post from dates specified in the award. Appeals were filed by the State against those orders which were dismissed by the industrial court and writ petitions also came to be dismissed by the High Court. This resulted in passing of the orders by the concerned authorities in the State Government classifying these petitioners as permanent employees. It was also ordered that they shall be entitled to minimum pay as fixed by the Labour Commission. This led to another round of litigation as the petitioners claimed that on their classification as 'permanent' to their respective posts they were entitled to receive the pay-scale attached to the said posts. These reliefs were granted to them by the labour court against which appeal preferred before the industrial court and the writ petition before the High Court were also dismissed. In all these cases, thereafter, special leave petitions were filed which were dismissed by this Court by common order dated 21^st January, 2015. This order reads as under:

“Delay condoned.

Dismissed.

We direct the State Government to implement the order(s) passed by the High Court within eight months' time from today.

If for any reason, the petitioner-State does not implement the order(s) passed by the High Court, the respondents are at liberty to approach this Court by way of filing contempt petition(s).”

2) The State Government has passed the orders fixing the pay of these petitioners at the minimum of the regular pay-scale attached to the respective posts. To demonstrate, by way of example, in the case of Ram Naresh Rawat, who was engaged as a daily wager, the pay is fixed at Rs. 15330/- in the pay-scale of Rs. 5200/- attached to the said post. Break up of the aforesaid salary fixing is as under:

At the time of passing the order, he was getting monthly wage of Rs. 11,300/- as the daily wager. His salary, therefore, stands enhanced of Rs. 4030/-. In addition, he is given arrears in the sum of Rs. 5,93,887/-. In similar manner, pay of all the petitioners has been fixed.

3) The petitioners are, however, not satisfied with the aforesaid fixation and contended that the pay fixation has not been done as per the orders of this Court. The precise submission is that once they are conferred the status of permanent employee by the court and it is also categorically held that they are entitled to regular pay attached to the said post, not only the pay should be fixed in the regular pay-scale, the petitioners would also be entitled to the increments and other emoluments attached to the said post. In other words, they pleaded that fixation of pay at the minimum of the pay-scale is uncalled for and does not amount to complying with the directions of the Court in full measure. It is also submitted that in some other cases where the High Court has given similar directions, which are followed in their cases, the State Government has not only fixed pay in the regular pay-scale but has also been granting increments etc. as well.

4) The case set up by the respondents, on the other hand, is that the petitioners are daily wage employees. They have not been 'regularised'

Click Here to Read the rest of this document