ITEM NO.701 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO.5875/1994 KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH & ANR Appellant(s)

VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH C.A.No.5876-5890/1994 (With appln. for impleading party and stay and Office Report)

W.P.(C) No.580/1995 (With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of petitioner and directions and impleadment and office report)

C.A. No. 3533-3595/1995 (With appln. (s) for clarification, directions and intervention and impleadment and Office Report)

Date : 16/11/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.NAGESWARA RAO For Appellant(s)

Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Adv. (A.C.)(N.P.)

Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, AG (N.P.)

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Ms. Madhvi Divan, Adv.

Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv.

Mr. Dhruv Tamta, Adv.

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Signature Not Verified Mr. S.S. Rebello, Adv.

Digitally signed by ASHOK RAJ SINGH Mr. Amogh V. Prabhudesai, Adv.

Date: 2016.11.17

17:04:26 IST Reason: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Subhash Acharya, Adv.

Mr. Pankaj Pandey, Adv.

Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv.

Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv.

(CA No.3533-3595/ Mr. L.R. Singh, Adv.

1995) Ms. Shabeena Anjum, Adv.

Ms. Mitali Chauhan, Adv.

Ms. Gargi Srivastava, Adv.

Ms. Shubhi Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Akhilesh Pandey, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv.

Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv.

(CA No.3533/1995) Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv.

Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Shivam Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Raina, Adv. Mr. Shreyas Jain, Adv.

Mr. Advitiya Awasthi, Adv.

Ms. Varsha Poddar, Adv.

Mr. Milind Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Sagar Chakravarty, Adv. Mr. Ram Kishore Singh, Adv.

Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Adv.

Ms. Apoorva Garg, Adv.

Ms. Babita Kushwaha, Adv.

Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Adv.

Ms. Anu Tyagi, Adv.

(CA No.3533-3595/ Ms. Jennifer Rohita, Adv.

1995) Ms. Jaya Bharuka, Adv.

Mr. Ravi Bharuka, Adv.

Ms. Arpita Bishnoi, Adv.

Mr. Manav Vohra, Adv.

Ms. Svadha Shankar, Adv.

Mr. C.D. Singh, Adv.

(CA No.5875/1994) Ms. Sylona Mohapatra, Adv.

Mr. Rahul Rajput, Adv.

Mr. Pankaj Pandey, Adv.

Mr. R.C. Upadhya, Adv.

Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Adv.

Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv.

Ms. Nidhi Khanna, Adv.

Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv.

(I.A. No.2/2016) Mr. Ritin Rai, Adv.

Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv.

Mr. B.B. Singh, Adv.

Mr. P. Narasimhan, Adv. Ms. Manjula Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv.

Mr. Subhash Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Prem Sunder Jha, Adv.

Mr. R.U. Upadhyay, Adv.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Adv.

Mr. S.R. Setia, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Bihar commenced his arguments at 10.30 a.m. and continued till 11.40 a.m. Mr.Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General then made his submissions for a while from 11.40 a.m. to 12.20 p.m. Thereafter, Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel again resumed his arguments at 12.20 p.m. and concluded at 2.50 p.m followed by Mr.Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General who made his submission from 2.50 p.m. to 3.25 p.m. Mr.C.U. Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for intervenor in I.A.No.2/2016 also made his submissions from 3.25 p.m. to 4.00 p.m.

The matters remained part-heard to be listed again tomorrow on Thursday, 17^th November, 2016.

ITEM NO.701 COURT NO.1 SECTIONS XVI & X (PART-HEARD)

CIVIL APPEAL NO.5875 OF 1994 ETC. ETC.

KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH & ANR ...Appellant(s)

VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ...Respondent(s)

Dated: 17/11/2016 : These matters were called on for hearing today CORAM AND APPEARANCE : SAME AS ABOVE Mr.Salman Khursid, learned senior counsel appearing for appellant in C.A.No.5876-5890 of 1994 commenced his arguments at 10.30 a.m. and concluded at 11.50 a.m. Thereafter, Mr.Amarendra Sharan, learned senior counsel commenced his arguments at 11.50 a.m. and concluded a