Back
UDAY UMESH LALIT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, SUDHANSHU DHULIA, JJ
DR. P. VARAVARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. leave granted indicating procedural progression. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the appellant's health conditions warranting bail. (Para 3) |
| 3. statutory restrictions and constitutional rights on bail harmonized. (Para 15) |
| 4. court decision for permanent bail based on medical grounds. (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1206 OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5913 of 2022)
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Interim Application No.2018 of 2021 in Criminal Appeal No.52 of 2021 preferred by the present appellant.
3. The appellant, presently 82 years of age, was kept in house arrest on 28.08.2018, whereafter regular custody was obtained by ACP Swargate, Pune on 17.11.2018 in connection with the instant crime. The police thus had the benefit of custodial interrogation though we are not strictly concerned with that facet of the matter as the instant case revolves around the issue of grant of bail on medical condition of the appellant.
4. By order dated 22.02.2021, the Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay while considering Criminal Appeal No.52 of 2021 and Criminal Writ P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
