SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Online)(SC) 88

SAIKIA,K.N. (J)
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
HARIHAR PRASAD DEBUKA ETC. – Respondent


Advocates:

HEADNOTE:

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2-a) of section 31 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 the Commission- er of Commercial Taxes, Bihar issued a Notification dated 28th December, 1985 adopting Forms XXVIII A and XXVIII B as the declaration for the purposes of verification and assess- ment of the sales-tax payable. Clause 1 of the Notification provided that a person transporting goods, exceeding the quantity notified under section 35, on a goods carrier or a vessel shall carry Form XXVIII A or XXVIII B duly filled up in respect of goods being brought into the State or being sent out of the State. Clause 2 of the Notification provided that in case a form is found blank or not containing all the particulars, it shall be deemed to be a violation of the provisions of sub-section (2-a) of section 31 of the Act.

The respondent, a registered dealer under the Bihar Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act purchased 165 bags of mustard in the State of Rajasthan and was transport- ing the same therefrom to 797 Jamshedpur in the State of Bihar. The officers of the Inves- tigation Bureau Jamshedpur Division seized the vehicle along with the goods on the ground that in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top