SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Online)(SC) 29

VENKATARAMIAH,E.S. (J)
RAM SINGH & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
GRAM PANCHAYAT MEHAL KALAN & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 5

PETITIONER:

RAM SINGH & ORS.

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

GRAM PANCHAYAT MEHAL KALAN & ORS.

DATE OF JUDGMENT22/09/1986

BENCH:

VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J)

BENCH:

VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J)

KHALID, V. (J)

CITATION:

1986 AIR 2197 1986 SCC (4) 364

JT 1986 497 1986 SCALE (2)472

ACT:

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961: ss.

11-13 Suit against Panchayat seeking declaration and

possession of shamlat deh-Correctness of entries in revenue

records-Whether Civil Court has jurisdiction.

Civil Procedure Code, O.I., R. 8-Civil Suit for

declaration/possession of Shamlat deh lands-Not

maintainable.

HEADNOTE:

Section 11 of the Punjab Village Common Lands

(Regulation) Act, 1961 conferred jurisdiction on the

Collector to decide cases of persons claiming right, title

or interest in any land vested or deemed to have been vested

in a Panchayat, or claiming that any land has not so vested

in a Panchayat and against such order an appeal was provided

to the Commissioner. Under s. 12 every order of the

Collector or Commissioner was final and such

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top