ERADI, V. BALAKRISHNA, OZA, G.L., JJ
MRS. ELIZABETH DINSHAW – Appellant
Versus
ARVAND M. DINSHAW AND ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner and respondent's marital history leading to legal custody dispute. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. explanation of the father's violation of custody orders and subsequent abduction. (Para 5 , 6) |
The petitioner, a citizen of the United States of America residing Michigan, was married to the first respondent, an Indian citizen, who after marriage settled down in the United States and secured employment. A male child was born to the couple in America. Difference arose between them and the petitioner alongwith her son took up separate residence. She tiled a petition for divorce in the Circuit Court for the country of saginaw, Michigan which granted a decree holding that there had been a breakdown in the marriage relationship and declared tile marriage as dissolved. The decree also directed that the petitioner slab hove the care,. custody and control of the minor child until he reaches the age of 18 years. The first respondent, the father was given visitation rights by the decree. On the abject of travel with the minor child to any place outside the United States, it was directed that only on a petition the Court shall make a determination as to whether such travel is in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.