SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Online)(SC) 34

FAZALALI,SYED MURTAZA
MADHUSDAN SINGH & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:

HEADNOTE:

The petitioners, in this round of challenge assailed the validity of Section 14M, 17(c), 17(6) and 21 B of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, calling to their aid certain observations made by this Court in Sri Sri Kalimata Thakurani and Sri Sri Raghunath Jain & Ors etc v. Union of India & Ors. [1981] 2 S.C.R. 950 and the decisions in Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. [1981] 1 S.C.R. 206 and Waman Rao & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. [1981] 2 S.C.R. 1 The petitioners raised the following points:

(i) that the total ceiling area allowed to be retained by the 1953 Act in respect of agricultural land in Khas possession of the Raiyats was drastically reduced;

(ii) that although the status of Raiyats was conferred on the erstwhile landlords which was heritable and transferable, the institution of bargards was introduced in order to enable the raiyats to cultivate their lands on a 50:50 basis and,

(iii) that while the Amendment Act of 1972 had given a right to the raiyats to resume the lands given to the bargardars for their personal cultivation; the subsequent amendments took away this right and made the right of the bargardar both heritable and transferable causing serious

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top