REDDY,O. CHINNAPPA (J)
S.K. BHATIA & OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS. – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 4
PETITIONER:
S.K. BHATIA & OTHERS
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT12/08/1983
BENCH:
REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J)
BENCH:
REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J)
DESAI, D.A.
CITATION:
1983 AIR 988 1983 SCR (3) 595
1983 SCC (4) 194 1983 SCALE (2)95
ACT:
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939-condition fn a permit as to
age of mini buses-whether infringes Article 14 of the
Constitution.
U. P. Motor Vehicles (Special Provisions) Act 1976’
section 4-scope of.
HEADNOTE:
A condition that the motor vehicle covered by the
permit shall not be more than four years old, counted from
the date of registration to any time during the validity of
the permit is attached to every permit for plying a mini
bus. The petitioners contended (i) that this condition
amounted to an infringement of Article 14 of the
Constitution in that no such condition was attached in the
case of omnibuses and (ii) that the authority competent to
impose the condition was the authority constituted under the
U. P. Act and not tho Regional Transport Authority.
Dismissing the petitions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.