SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(SC) 3575

ARUN MISHRA, INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ
PURSWANI ASHUTOSH (MINOR) THROUGH DR. KAMLESH VIRUMAL PURSWANI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (C) No.669 OF 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. Govind Jee, Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma, Ms. Neelam Sharma, Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Mr. Nishish Sharma, Mr. Shubhendu Anand, Mr. Sarthak Raizada, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mr. Vikas Singh, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Mr. Kapish Seth, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Jesal Wahi, Ms. Vishakha, Ms. Mamta Singh

A person with benchmark disability cannot be denied admission in medical courses if they qualify according to merit and applicable reservation provisions.

Headnote:(A) Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 2(r) and 32 - Reservation for persons with benchmark disability - Applicability of Medical Education Regulations to the admissions of persons with disabilities in medical courses. Court holds that a person with low vision may not be denied admission if he qualifies under the merit list as per provisions of the Act. (Paras 32, 33, 40, 41)

(B) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 15 - Right to equality and non-discrimination - Difficulty faced by students with disabilities in accessing admission to educational institutions.

Facts of the case:
A minor with low vision claimed his right to reservation for admission to the MBBS course, as per the provisions of the Disabilities Act, facing discrimination from relevant authorities refusing him admission on grounds of unsuitability due to his vision impairment.

Findings of Court:
The Regulations enforced have statutory backing and incorporate the provisions concerning reservations, which are binding on the MCI. The petitioner, if meritorious, shall be entitled to admission in the 2018-19 academic year.

Issues: Whether the provisions of reservation under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act apply to admission into the MBBS course, and the consequential eligibility of a student with low vision.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner, having benchmark disability, cannot automatically be denied admission solely based on suitability if he qualifies in the merit list, underlining the importance of equal treatment and access in higher education.

Result: Writ Petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner admission if he qualifies under his category.

O R D E R

The question which arises in this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is, whether a person with benchmark disability of low vision, within the meaning of Section 2 (r), read with Clause 1B of the Schedule, of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act , 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘2016 Act’) can be denied the benefit of reservation for admission to the MBBS Medical Course.

On 13th December, 2006, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which inter alia lays down the following principles for empowerment of persons with disabilities:

(a) respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy Signature Not Verifiiedncluding the freedom to make one’s own choices, and independence of persons;

(b) non-discrimination;

(c) full and effective participation and inclusion in society;

(d) respect for difference and acceptance of persons with disabilities as part of human diversity and humanity;

(e) equality of opportunity;

(f) accessibility;

(g) equality between men and women;

(h) respect for the evolving capacities of children with disabilities and respect for the right of children with disabilities to preserve their identities.

India ratified the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on 1st October, 2007. The 2016 Act has been enacted to give effect to the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Right to Equality envisaged under Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India contemplates equal rights in every respect including equal right to be considered for admission to educational institutions and related benefits.

Section 2 (r) of the 2016 Act defines “person with benchmark disability” to mean “a person with not less than forty per cent of a specified disability where specified disability has not been defined in measurable terms and includes a person with disability where specified disability has been defined in measurable terms, as certified by the certifying authority”.

Specified disability has been defined in Section 2 (zc) of the 2016 Act to mean the disabilities as specified in the schedule.

Visual impairment which includes low vision is a specified disability as set forth in Clause 1B of the Schedule to the 2016 Act, set out hereinunder:

“B. Visual Impairment-

(a) ‘blindness’ means a condition where a person has any of the following conditions, after best correction-

(i) total absence of sight; or

(ii) visual acuity less than 3/60 or less than 10/200 (Snellen) in the better eye with best possible correction; or

(iii) limitation of the field of vision subtending an angle of less than 10 degree

(b) “low-vision” means a condition where a person has any of the following conditions, namely:-

(i) visual acuity not exceeding 6/18 or less than 20/60 upto 3/60 or upto 10/200 (Snellen) in the better eye with best possible corrections; or (ii)

limitation of the field of vision subtending an angle of less than 40 degree up to 10 degree.”

Section 32 of the 2016 Act provides as follows:

“32. (1) All Government institutions of higher education and other higher education institutions receiving aid from the Government shall reserve not less than five per cent seats for persons with benchmark disabilities.

(2) The persons with benchmark disabilities shall be given an upper age relaxation of five years for admission in institutions of higher education”.

In Exercise of powers conferred by Section 33 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, the Medical Council of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘the MCI’) has framed the “Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the Medical Education Regulations.

By an amendment notification No. MCI 34(41)/2017-Med/169873 dated 22nd January, 2018, the MCI amended the Medical Education Regulations by the Regulations on Graduate Medical Education (Amendment),

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top