SANTOSH S/O SHANKAR PAWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
Crl.A. No.-000683-000683 / 2015
21-04-2015
º\222 1
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COUT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 683 OF 2015
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.5741/2013)
SANTOSH s/o SHANKAR PAWAR ...Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. BANUMATHI, J.
Leave granted.
2. This appeal arises out of the judgment of the Nagpur
Bench of the Bombay High Court passed in Criminal Appeal
No.343 of 2006 dated 2.2.2012 affirming the conviction of the
appellant under Section 302 IPC and the sentence of life
imprisonment imposed on him by the 5 th Addl. Sessions Judge,
Akola.
3. Briefly stated, case of prosecution is that the marriage of
the appellant Santosh Pawar and deceased Saraswatibai was
solemnized on 17.6.2005. Due to poverty, the deceased alongwith
Signature Not Verified
the accused was residing adjacent to her parental house situated
Digitally signed by
Mahabir Singh
Date: 2015.04.21
16:36:39 IST
Reason:
at Ramji Nagar Boragonmanju in a rented house of one Kankale,
since one month prior to the incident. The appellant and the
2
deceased were earning their livelihood by doing daily wages work.
On 4.9.2005 at about 6.00 A.M., the deceased Saraswatibai went
to answer nature’s call and on her return, the deceased was
questioned by the appellant as to why she returned late and the
accused suspected her fidelity. Inspite of deceased trying to
convince the appellant, the appellant started assaulting her with
fists and kicks. The appellant poured kerosene from a nearby
lamp and set her ablaze. Saree of the deceased caught fire and the
deceased ran towards the accused in an attempt to catch him,
thereby burning the hands of the accused. When deceased started
screaming for help, the appellant, in order to save her, poured
water on the deceased. In the meanwhile, the neighbours and the
parents of the deceased gathered and the deceased was taken to
the hospital. On the way to the hospital, the deceased narrated
the incident to her mother Gangabai-PW2 and
sister-in-law-Sindhu Sunil Ingole (PW3) and also to neighbour
Raju Janrao Gavai -PW1. On receipt of information about the
occurrence, Sub Inspector of Police-Digmber Ramrao Ravrale
(PW9) went to the Government Hospital and he verified the
condition of the deceased through the Medical Officer. PW9 then
recorded the statement of deceased-Ex.24, on the basis of which
FIR was registered for the offence under Section 307 IPC. On
3
requisition, PW7-the then Executive Magistrate, went to the
hospital and satisfied himself about the fit mental condition of the
deceased through Dr. Vijaya Madhuarrao Pawanikar-PW6 and
thereafter PW7 recorded the dying declaration of deceased
Saraswatibai. Saraswatibai succumbed to burn injuries on
12.09.2005. On the death of Saraswatibai, the FIR was altered to
Section 302 IPC. Dr. Satish Udaybhanu Padhan-PW8 conducted
autopsy on the body of deceased Saraswatibai and issued
Ex.22-Post Mortem certificate. PW8 opined that the deceased died
due to shock and septicaemia caused by 60% burn injuries.
Inquest was held and on completion and further investigation,
chargesheet was filed against the appellant under Section 302 IPC.
4. To bring home the g
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.