SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 400

SUPREME COURT
Vikram Nath, *Sandeep Mehta, JJ.
Binod Kumar Pandey @ Vinod Kumar Pandey v. State of Jharkhand


1. Heard.

2. Leave granted.

3. These three appeals arise from the common impugned judgment and final order dated 18th December, 2024 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi (Hereinafter, being referred to as the "High Court") in Writ Petition (Crl) No. 283 of 2024, Writ Petition (Crl) No. 279 of 2024 and Writ Petition (Crl) No. 419 of 2024 whereby the writ petitions filed by the appellants challenging the legality and validity of sanction order dated 3rd October, 2023 came to be rejected.

Brief Facts

4. The appellants herein were arraigned as accused in connection with First Information Report (For short "FIR") No. 1 / 2022 lodged at Police Station A.T.S. Ranchi on 17th January, 2022. It was inter alia, alleged in the FIR that the appellants were members of a gang being operated by gangster Aman Shrivastava and were involved in extortion of illegal money from businessmen and such illegally acquired monies were, thereafter, transferred through illicit hawala channels. In this manner, the appellants were spreading terror in and around Jharkhand. Currency notes, amounting to Rs.28,55,000/-, were recovered from the possession of Siddarth Sahu (accused No.12) and Rs.5,42,000/-

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top