SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 521

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Manoj Misra, JJ
V. Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
State Rep By The Sub Inspector Of Police – Respondent


Table of Content
1. history of proceedings and nature of the criminal complaint. (Para 1 , 2)

MANOJ MISRA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal impugns the judgment and order of the High Court at Madras, Digitally signed by dated 06.04.2023 in Crl. O.P. No. 847 of 2021 and Crl. M.P. No. 518 of 2021, whereby the prayer of the appellant to quash final report and consequential proceedings in C.C. No.

Signature Not Verified

3569 of 2020 on the file of the Metropolitan CHETAN ARORA Date: 2026.03.19 Reason:

1 The High Court

Chennai-600008, under Section 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Magistrate (CCB and CBCID, Metro Cases), Egmore,, was partly allowed to the extent of indictment under IPC; however, the prayer to quash indictment under Section 420 was declined.

3. In brief, the prosecution case, as could be evinced from the final report (i.e., police report) submitted under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, CrPC, is that the accused (the appellant herein) was producing a ‘movie’. In the course of its production, he ran short of funds. He, therefore, requested the de-facto complainant (i.e., the second-respondent herein) to lend him money on assurance that it wo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top