Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Pankaj Mithal, S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ
Subramani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and factual background of the criminal case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defense arguments regarding the reliability of witness testimony and dying declarations. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. evaluating evidence through eyewitness accounts, medical records, and dying declarations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. rejection of trivial witness discrepancies to confirm conviction based on cumulative evidence. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeal and confirmation of sentencing. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
PANKAJ MITHAL, J.
1. The appellant - Subramani and the deceased Chennamma were husband and wife. They were married for seventeen years before the date of the incident. They had two daughters and two sons. The eldest daughter was aged about sixteen years at the Signature Not Verified GEETA AHUJA Date: 2026.03.17 relevant time. They had lived a happy married life for about
17:00:36 IST Reason:
three years. Thereafter, their relations became strained, and it is alleged that the appellant started ill-treating the deceased and kept on raising demands for money, which the father of the deceased fulfilled most of the time. The appell
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
