The Supreme Court will not interfere with concurrent findings of the NCLT and NCLAT where no patent error or substantial question of law exists.

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3. Upon consideration of submissions and perusal of materials available on record, we do not find any error in the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on I.A. No. 2785/2021 in CP (IB) No. 863/PB/2020 as affirmed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). Therefore, no question of law arises for our consideration.

4. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

…………………………………………………………………………..J [MANOJ MISRA]

Signature Not Verified …………………………………………………………………………..J D C i H g E ita T l A ly N s i A gn R e O d R b A y [MANMOHAN]

Date: 2026.03.18 Reason:

March 17, 2026 ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.14 SECTION XVII-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS @ Diary No. 8236/2026 U.P. RAJYA VIDYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LIMITED Appellant(s)

VERSUS ASHISH CHHAWCHHARIA & ANR. Respondent(s)

IA No. 63340/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING Date : 17-03-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN For Appellant(s) :

Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Divyam Agarwal, AOR Mr. Akshat Jain, Adv.

Ms. Pallavi Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Kavya Jha, Adv. For Respondent(s) :

M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Sandeep Singhi, Adv.

Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv.

Mr. Vishal Gehrana, Adv.

Ms. Aakriti Vohra, Adv.

Ms. Varsha Himatsinka, Adv.

Ms. Shruti Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Tribhuvan Narain Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.