SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 674

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KARANJEET KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-003596 - 2026



ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.7 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)

No. 3596/2026 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-01-2026 in CRMM No. 56666/2026 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh]

KARANJEET KAUR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s)

(IA No. 62591/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 62592/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 62590/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES WITH SLP(Crl) No. 3595/2026 (II-B)

(IA No. 62558/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 62560/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 62551/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

C D H at A e N : 2 D 0 R 2 E 6. S 0 H 3.1S3 LP(Crl.) No. 3596/2026 1

16:02:54 IST Reason:

Date : 13-03-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI For Petitioner(s) :Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv.

Mrs. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, AOR Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.

Dr. M.k Ravi, Adv.

Mr. Denson Joseph, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR Mr. Neeraj, Adv.

Mr. Vikram Choudhary, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. The petitioners have been denied anticipatory bail by the High Court in connection with First Information Report bearing No. 118 of 2025 registered with Division B Police Station, Police Commissionerate, Amritsar for the offence punishable under Sections 80 and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “the BNS, 2023”), respectively.

2. The deceased was married to Inderjit Singh past 11/2 years. The two petitioners before us are sisters of Inderjit Singh i.e., the sisters-in-law of the deceased.

3. It is the case of the prosecution that there was undue harassment at the end of the husband and the two petitioners before us to the deceased due to which the deceased took the extreme step of committing suicide. It appears that the deceased left behind her suicide note naming the two petitioners before us. However, she also stated that no action be taken against the two petitioners.

4. We heard Ms. Meenakshi Arora, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr.Neeraj, the learned counsel appearing for the State and Mr. Dinesh Verma, the learned counsel appearing for the first informant.

5. We take into consideration the following aspects:-

(I) The petitioners before us are lady accused.

(II) Both the petitioners have minor children.

(III) Both the petitioners are residing separately at their respective matrimonial homes.

6. In view of the aforesaid, we order that in the event of the arrest of the two petitioners, in connection with the offence enumerated above, they shall be released on anticipatory bail subject to terms and conditions that the Investigating Officer (I.O.)

may deem fit to impose.

7. The petitioners shall now appear before the I.O. for the purpose of their interrogation and recording of their statements.

8. With the aforesaid, these Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of.

9. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(CHANDRESH) (POOJA SHARMA)

ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top