SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 795

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
PRABHU KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent


2026 INSC 253 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 868 OF 2024 PRABHU KUMAR ….APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & OTHERS ….RESPONDENT(S)

J U D G M E N T

Mehta, J.

1. Heard.

2. The appellant herein, a Law Graduate, is a specially-abled person suffering from 90% permanent locomotor disability due to left shoulder disarticulation. He has been practicing as an advocate since 2015.

3. He has preferred the instant appeal for assailing the judgment dated 29th September, 2020 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla1 in C.W.P. No. 3634 of 2019, whereby the High Court Signature Not Verified D N i E g E ita T l U ly K si H gn A e J d U R by IA Date: 2026.03.17

Reason: 1 Hereinafter referred to as “High Court”.

dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant and rejected his claim for appointment to the post of Assistant District Attorney, For short “ADA”.

Brief Facts: -

4. The facts relevant and essential for the disposal of the appeal are noted hereinbelow.

5. An advertisement dated 2nd May, 2018 was issued by respondent No. 3- Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, Hereinafter referred to as “Commission”. for 24 p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top