SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 833

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RAVI PRAKSH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-003091 - 2026



ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).3091/2026 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-07-2025 in CRMBCA No. 57/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench]

RAVI PRAKSH SINGH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)

IA No. 27831/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT

IA No. 27830/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 11-03-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shilp Vinod, AOR For Respondent(s) :

Mr. Divyank Dutt Dwivedi, Adv.

Mr. Satyarth Balajee Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Prateek Ranjan, Adv.

Mr. Vishal Kalra, Adv.

Mr. Divye Puri, AOR Mr. Shaurya Sahay, AOR Mr. Aman Jaiswal, Adv.

Ms. Sharvi Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Ashish Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following Signa ture No t Ve rifi ed O R D E R MOHD IBRAHIM Date: 2026.03.14 Reason:

counsel appearing for the complainant brought something to our notice that we should not overlook or ignore.

2. The first thing that they brought to our notice is that the bail which was granted by the High Court vide order dated

24.04.2023 came to be cancelled on 22.07.2025.

3. Once the bail stood cancelled, it was expected of the petitioner - accused to surrender before the jail authorities. 4. However, the petitioner came before this Court seeking to challenge the impugned order passed by the High Court cancelling bail sometime in February, 2026.

5. It is true that when notice came to be issued by this Court, we stayed the operation, implementation and execution of the impugned order passed by the High Court cancelling the bail.

6. However, from 22.01.2025, the petitioner is at large. He is not available.

7. The second thing that was brought to our notice is that the petitioner is a habitual offender. In the past, he had indulged in many other cases of impersonating himself, forgery, etc.

8. We want the State to collect the necessary information as regards the aforesaid and place it before us by way of an affidavit duly affirmed by the Investigating Officer. One copy of such affidavit shall be furnished well in advance to the

counsel appearing for the complainant.

9. If the petitioner has to say anything as regards the contents of the affidavit that may be filed by the State, a rejoinder may be filed accordingly.

10. Post the Special Leave Petition on 25.03.2026.

(HARPREET KAUR) (POOJA SHARMA)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top