SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 844

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA


CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION


TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3222 OF 2025


PRIYA … PETITIONER

VERSUS

ARVIND … RESPONDENT


…………………………………………………,J.

[J.K. MAHESHWARI]


…………………………………………………,J.

[ATUL S. CHANDURKAR]


New Delhi;

March 11, 2026.


ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVI-A



S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 3222/2025


PRIYA Petitioner(s)


VERSUS


ARVIND Respondent(s)


(FOR ADMISSION IA No. 294077/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.


IA No. 294076/2025 - STAY APPLICATION)


Date : 11-03-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.


CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR


For Petitioner(s) :Ms. Anita Tripathi, Sr. Adv.


Ms. Shraddha Saxena, Adv.


Mr. Umesh Dubey, AOR


For Respondent(s) :


UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R


The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the signed order. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.


(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (NAND KISHOR)


DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR


(Signed order is placed on the file)

O R D E R

1. The petitioner (wife) has filed this petition seeking transfer of Family Main Case No. 414/2025 titled as Arvind vs. Priya filed by the respondent (husband) under Section 13(A) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, from the court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge No.10 (Family Court), Jaipur Metro-1, Sanganer to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh.

2. Despite service of notice on the respondent, no one has entered appearance on his behalf. However, vide order dated 05.02.2026, awaiting representation of the DGD

1R3 i a e ug :t a l 0 ise t s3 ah: o : la2 l 0n yn04: s 2 K I i 6S gu. n T0me 3ad .1r b 4Ayrora

respondent, the matter was adjourned. Even today, there is no one present on behalf of the respondent to oppose the prayer as made in the transfer petition.

3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the distance between Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan and Jaunpur, Uttar pradesh, it would be inconvenient to the petitioner (wife) to attend the proceedings at Sanganer, Jaipur.

4. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to allow this transfer petition and accordingly, Family Main Case No. 414/2025 titled as Arvind vs. Priya filed by the respondent (husband) under Section 13(A) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is ordered to be transferred from the court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge No.10 (Family Court), Jaipur Metro-1, Sanganer to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh.

5. It is on the discretion of the transferee Court to allow the presence of the respondent (husband) virtually until necessarily required.

6. On intimation by e-mail, the records of the case be transferred to the transferee Court without any delay and immediate compliance be made.

7. The transfer petition is, accordingly, allowed.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top