SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 891

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SARABJIT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-004131 - 2026



ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.7 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.4131/2026 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-02-2026 in CRM-M No. 6570/2026 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh]

SARABJIT KAUR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s)

IA No. 71103/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 71104/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 10-03-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Harnoor Singh Sidhu, Adv.

Mr. Randeep Singh Gill, Adv.

Mr. Vikram Patralekh, Adv.

Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Mr. Anupam Kishore Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Dhruv Kaushik, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nupur Kumar, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. The petitioner a lady accused has been denied anticipatory Signature Not Verified CHANDRESH Date: 2026.03.10

17:06:07 IST Reason:

bail by the High Court in connection with First Information Report No. 2 of 2026 registered with Sherpur, Police Station, District Sangrur, State of Punjab for the offence punishable under Sections 127(2), 308(2), 351(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “the BNS, 2023”), respectively.

2. Prima facie, it appears from the materials on record that the original first informant is running a jewellery shop. The petitioner accused is alleged to have visited the jewellery shop and then one fine day as alleged, the first informant visited the house of the petitioner to discuss something in connection with sale of a property and at that point of time the other co- accused arrived and stripped him naked.It is alleged that the accused persons in collusion with each other tried to extort money from the first informant.

3. We take notice of the fact that the alleged date of incident is 20.06.2025 whereas the FIR came to be registered on

05.01.2026 i.e., almost after a period of 07 months.

4. We heard Mr. Randeep Singh Gill, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Nupur Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the State.

5. We direct the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer (I.O.) on 13.03.2026.

6. On 13.3.2026, the I.O. shall interrogate the petitioner and record her statement. However, the petitioner shall not be arrested.

7. Post this matter for further hearing on 17.03.2026.

8. On the next date of hearing, we would also like to know from the State as regards the criminal antecedent(s) of the petitioner.

(CHANDRESH) (POOJA SHARMA)

ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top