SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 900

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RG LUXURY HOMEBUYERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH GOYAL – Respondent
C.A. No.-006923 - 2021



ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.13 SECTION XVII-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO.6923/2021 RG LUXURY HOMEBUYERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) & ANR. Appellant(s)

VERSUS RAJESH GOYAL & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH CONMT.PET.(C) No. 80/2026 in C.A. No. 6923/2021 (XVII-B)

FOR ADMISSION Diary No(s). 48524/2025 (XVII-B)

Date : 10-03-2026 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, AOR Mr. M L Lahoty, Adv.

Mr. Anchit Sripat, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. Ms. Siddhi Bohra, Adv.

Ms. Disha Dogra, Adv.

Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, AOR Mr. Shailendra Kumar Nirmal, Adv.

Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Adv. Mr. Surya Pratap, Adv. Mrs. Reena Patel, Adv.

Mr. Anurag Jain, Adv.

Mr. Onkar Prasad, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :Mr. Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Saurabh Jain, Adv.

Signa ture No t Ve rifi ed Mr. Prayag Jain, Adv.

Digita lly s ign ed b y Mr. Rohit K. Singh, AOR KAVITA PAHUJA Date: 2026.03.12 Reason:

Mr. Sidharth Dave, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Abhndra Maheshwari, Adv.

Mr. Kumar Mihir, AOR Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Saxena, Adv.

Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv.

Ms. Neha Das, Adv.

Mr. Shivam Saksena, Adv.

Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kaushik Poddar, AOR Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, AOR Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR Dr. Manish Aggarwal, Adv.

Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, AOR Mr. Amit Ambawat, Adv.

Ms. Namrata Sharma, Adv.

Ms. Sruthi Iyer, Adv.

Ms. Rupali Panwar, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Sharma, Adv.

Ms. Riya Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shriya Maini, AOR Mr. Mks Menon, Adv.

Ms. Usha Nandini V., AOR Mr. John Thomas Arakal, Adv.

Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Sundeep Pandhi, Adv.

Ms. Velasree S, Adv.

Mr. M.venkata Vasudev, Adv.

Ms. Preeti Chauhan, Adv.

Mrs. Arpana Soni, Adv. Mr. Rajat Baijal, Adv.

Mr. Vedant Singh, AOR Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Jain, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Singh Dingra, Adv.

Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv.

Mr. Varun Varma, Adv.

Mr. Anupam Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Raghavedra Pratap Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. On 13.01.2026, we had passed the following order:

1. On 19.09.2025, following order was passed:

“1. On 18 July 2025 following order was passed:

“1. On 13.05.2025, following order was passed:

“Pursuant to this Court’s order dated 17th April, 2025, an affidavit has been filed by the first respondent dealing with 99 home buyers whose names are included in the list tendered on the last date by the learned counsel for the appellant across the Bar. Those buyers, out of 99, who have paid the entire amount and whose flats are ready, the first respondent shall proceed to hand over the possession to them. In case of the flats where work is in progress, as soon as the work is over, possession shall be handed over to those persons who have paid the entire amount. The learned senior counsel appearing for the first respondent states that an application for occupancy certificate in respect of Towers ‘G’ and ‘H’ has been made on 2nd May, 2025. We direct the first respondent to file further compliance report reporting compliance with all the directions issued by this Court from time to time by 14th July, 2025. List on 18th July, 2025. We have perused the affidavit filed by the fifth respondent/Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) of Rajesh Projects India Private Limited. If the fifth respondent has any grievance against the Enforcement Directorate, it is for the fifth respondent to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. IA No.121280/2025 - IMPLEADMENT IA No.121282/2025 – FOR DIRECTIONS The orders passed by this Court from time to time will show that an endeavour is being made to ensure that the developer gives possession of the flats to the home buyers. However, these applications seek to raise individual grievance regarding a particular flat, payment of maintenance etc. We dispose of these applications by granting liberty to the applicant to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.”

2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top