SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 940

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
IN RE: 2 MILLION LIVES AT RISK CONTAMINATION IN JOJARI RIVER RAJASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
– Respondent
SMW(C) No.-000008-000008 - 2025



ITEM NO.56 COURT NO.2 SECTION PIL-W S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No(s). 8/2025 IN RE: 2 MILLION LIVES AT RISK, CONTAMINATION IN JOJARI RIVER, RAJASTHAN IA No. 298385/2025 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT WITH C.A. No. 5517-5519/2022 (XVII)

IA No. 72275/2024 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION C.A. No. 8748/2022 (XVII)

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.162203/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT C.A. No. 9057-9058/2022 (XVII)

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.166086/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.177541/2022-STAY APPLICATION C.A. No. 9010-9011/2022 (XVII)

IA No.168478/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.179858/2022-STAY APPLICATION Date : 10-03-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA By Courts Motion For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G.

Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR Ms. Divya Jain, Adv.

Ms. Arveen Sekhon, Adv.

Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv.

Signa ture No t Ve rifi ed Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, Adv.

Digita lly s ign ed b y M/s Aura & Co., AOR NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2026.03.11 Reason:

Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AOR For Respondent(s) :Mrs. Archana Pathak Dave, A.S.G. (NP)

Ms. Harshita Choubey, Adv.

Ms. Aaditya Dixit, Adv.

Mr. Udit Dedhiya, Adv.

Mr. Varun Chugh, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Vats, Adv.

Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv.

Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G.

Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, Adv.

Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Siddharth Praveen Acharya, AOR Mr. Lakshay Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Bhuvnesh Vyas, Adv.

Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Avijit Roy, AOR Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AOR Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR Mr. Vinay Kothari, Adv.

Mr. Rk Rajwanshi, Adv.

Mr. Arpit Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandrika Prasad Mishra, AOR Mr. Nishant Awana, AOR Ms. Rini Badoni, Adv.

Mr. Gs Awana, Adv.

Mr. Mayank Chaudhary, Adv.

Ms. Pooja Chand Dwivedi, Adv.

M/s Nma Law Chambers, Adv.

Mr. Siddharth Praveen Acharya, AOR Mr. Lakshay Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Bhuvnesh Vyas, Adv.

Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy B, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The Committee constituted in pursuance of the order dated 21.11.2025 has forwarded a detailed interim report which runs into nearly 202 pages. The Committee has compartmentalized the report under various heads. The report, inter alia, contains an introduction to the entire Luni River system; details of the industries operating in the districts of Jodhpur, Pali and Balotra; particulars of the Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) functioning in these areas, including their installed capacities and operational load; and the Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) operating in the region.

The report further records the findings of the inspections carried out by the Committee in the villages, factories and other locations situated along the river system and also contains photographic material depicting the large-scale damage and environmental degradation caused by the overflowing of the effluent-filled river system. The report also sets out the directions issued by the Committee from time to time, the steps taken by the concerned authorities pursuant thereto, the proposed course of action in furtherance of this Court’s judgment dated 22.11.2025, the recommendations as contemplated in the said judgment, and the logistical issues being faced by the Committee in efficaciously carrying out the mandate entrusted to it by this Court.

We request the Registrar-cum-Nodal Officer of the Committee to forward a soft copy of the interim report (including the annexures) so that the same can be provided to all learned counsel representing the parties. The soft copy, once received, shall be uploaded and also circulated to the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.

Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State of Rajasthan assures that the issues pointed out by the Committee r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top