SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 951

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MOHAMMAD ANAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-018275 - 2025



ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No(s). 18275/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated

19-09-2025 in CRA No. 8463/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]

MOHAMMAD ANAS Petitioner(s)

VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)

IA No. 291338/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 291335/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

IA No. 294507/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES Date : 10-03-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shishir Prakash, Adv.

Ms. Karuna Krishan Thareja, Adv.

Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR Ms. Nayan Gupta, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR Mr. Rajasmit Mondal, Adv.

Ms. Pallavi Kumari, Adv.

Mr. Shashank Pachauri, Adv.

Digitaly signed by

KANCHAN CHOUHAN

Date: 2026.03.10 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Reason:

O R D E R

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner is involved in a case pursuant to the Case Crime No. 527/2016 registered under Sections 147, 323, 504 and 506 IPC r/w Sections 3(1)(x) of the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act with Police Station Naini District Prayagraj.

3. This Court has granted interim protection while entertaining Special Leave Petition on 19.11.2025 and has directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner if he joins the investigation.

4. Pursuant to our order dated 19.11.2025, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer (‘I.O.’).

5. Learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh accepts that the petitioner has joined the investigation and submits that the investigation has been completed and the chargesheet has also been filed.

6. In the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, we make the interim order of this Court dated

19.11.2025 absolute.

7. In the event of arrest of the petitioner pursuant to the aforesaid FIR, we direct that the petitioner be released on bail subject to the terms and conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court/Arresting Officer.

8. The special leave petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (NIDHI MATHUR)

SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top