SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1030

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SHISHIR KUMAR TRIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. /2026 [@ SLP [CRL.] NO.13061/2025]

SHISHIR KUMAR TRIVEDI & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appellants seek anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.201/2021, dated 11.06.2021, registered at Police Station- Bihar, District- Unnao, Uttar Pradesh for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

ASHA SUNDRIYAL D 18 a : t 5 e 3 : : 2 0 0 9 2 I 6 S . T 02.27 1 Reason:

Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has submitted that the appellants have been appearing before the Trial Court, however, the matter has been adjourned a few times at the instance of the prosecution.

In such view of the matter, the non-bailable warrants issued against the appellants stand set aside, subject to the conditions that may be imposed to enable the appellants to continue their cooperation with the conduct of the trial.

In such view of the matter, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the appellants. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set aside, and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top