SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1163

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AMIT KUMAR HARI @ AMIT KUMAR ABHIMANYU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-017171 - 2025



ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).17171/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24-09-2025 in CRM No.68248/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna]

AMIT KUMAR HARI @ AMIT KUMAR ABHIMANYU Petitioner(s)

VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. Respondent(s) (IA No. 272130/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT

IA No. 272131/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

IA No.64139/2026 – APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS)

Date : 26-02-2026 This matter was called for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Simanta Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Dalia Roy, Adv.

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Lalnunsanga, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ayush Anand, AOR Mr. Monu Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Vishal Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Ritu Raj, Adv.

Mr. Yash Raj Singh, Adv.

Mr. Krishan Kant Kumar, Adv.

Signa ture No t Ve rifi ed Digita lly s ign ed b y Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR Date: 2026.02.28 Reason:

Mr. Kumar Saurav, Adv.

O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Pursuant to our earlier order dated 25.11.2025, when the parties were sent to mediation initially, there was lack of cooperation on the side of the petitioner. However, later on, he did participate, but the mediation ultimately failed. The Court thus, has gone into the merits of the matter. Having heard the parties, the Court finds that no case for anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed. The order of this Court dated 25.11.2025 for continuation of the interim protection granted to the petitioner by the High Court vide the impugned order dated 24.09.2025 stands vacated.

3. Having said that, we notice that certain allegations have been made against some of the police officers of trying to coerce the petitioner even after the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by this Court extending the interim protection granted by the High Court to the petitioner, due to which, the petitioner has filed a complaint bearing M.P. No.264 of 2026 against those police officers before the learned CJM, Purnia. We further note that the said Court has also issued notice in the said petition. The said Court has also asked for a report from the concerned police, which is awaited.

4. Be that as it may, let the concerned Superintendent of Police applied with the aforesaid order of the learned CJM, Purnia without any delay. Thereafter, the learned CJM, Purnia shall take a call in accordance with law.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1-State of Bihar shall communicate the present order to the Trial Court.

6. A copy of this order be also sent to the learned CJM, Purnia.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top