SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1188

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
VANDANA JAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


2026 INSC 192 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1127 OF 2026 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No. 6670/2021)

VANDANA JAIN & ORS.APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S)

J U D G M E N T

MANOJ MISRA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal impugns the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Digitally signed by dated 30.07.2021 passed in Misc. Bench No. 16314 of 2021 whereby the writ Signature Not Verified DEEPAK SINGH D 17 a : t 2 e 9 : : 2 2 0 6 2 I 6 S . T

02.25 Reason:

1 High Court

petition of the appellants seeking quashing of FIR 2 No.0112 of 2021, dated 14.03.2021, lodged at Police Station (for short, P.S.) Hazratganj, District Lucknow, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, IPC, has been dismissed.

FACTS

3. Vandana Jain (appellant no. 1), Divya Bhatia, Siddharth Jain (appellant no.2) and Kanishk Jain (appellant no.3), described as first party, entered into a joint venture agreement, JVA dated 16.08.2010 with Motor General Sales Ltd. (Respondent No.2), described as second party. As per the terms and conditions of the JVA, the first party gave developm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top