SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1255

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ASHA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SUDHANSHU BHARDWAJ – Respondent
T.P.(C) No.-001689 - 2025



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION(S)(CIVIL) NO(S). 1689/2025 ASHA SHARMA PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS SUDHANSHU BHARDWAJ RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner–wife seeking transfer of HMA Petition No.45/2025 titled as "Sudhanshu Bhardwaj Versus Asha Sharma" pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ambala City, Haryana.

2. Though service is complete, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the sole respondent-husband.

3. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, in our opinion, a case is made out for transfer of divorce proceedings as the petitioner resides at Ambala Cantt, which is more than 100 Kms. from Paonta Sahib and she has 18 months old daughter to take care. She is totally dependent on her father and proceedings in one FIR are already pending at Ambala.

Signature Not Verified

4. Accordingly, HMA Petition No.45/2025 titled as "Sudhanshu Digitally signed by Nirmala Negi Date: 2026.02.28 Reason:

Bhardwaj Versus Asha Sharma" pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh is hereby transferred to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ambala City, Haryana.

5. Records shall be sent promptly by the Court where proceedings are pending to the transferee Court.

6. We also direct that if possible common date can be given in all the matters pending between the parties so as to enable them to appear in all the cases on a single day instead of different dates.

7. In case video conferencing facilities are available in the transferee Court, the parties may be permitted to appear through video conferencing.

8. Accordingly, the Transfer Petition is allowed.

(RAJESH BINDAL)

(VIJAY BISHNOI)

NEW DELHI;

February 25, 2026.

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.15 SECTION III-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER PETITION(S)(CIVIL) NO(S). 1689/2025 ASHA SHARMA PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS SUDHANSHU BHARDWAJ RESPONDENT(S)

IA No. 145087/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 145088/2025 - STAY APPLICATION Date : 25-02-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma, AOR Dr. Shiva Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rohit Vats, Adv.

Ms. Shubhangi Nasa, Adv.

Mrs. Ruchika, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(NIRMALA NEGI) (AKSHAY KUMAR BHORIA)

ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top