SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1357

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, R. Mahadevan, JJ
Shashikumar Alias Shahi Chikna Vivekanand Jurmani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Miscellaneous Application No.183/2026 | SLP(Crl) No.12690/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Pranay Chitale, Sana Raees Khan, Smiti Verma, Aditya Dutta
For the Respondents: Tushar Mehta, S.V. Raju, Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, Shrirang B. Varma, Bharat Bagla, Sourav Singh, Aditya Krishna, Adarsh Dubey, Chitransha Singh Sikarwar

The court emphasizes that the legal right of incarcerated persons to be produced before a court for addressing grievances is fundamental and cannot be disregarded due to administrative contingencies; such failures are systemic issues requiring Pan-India judicial oversight and virtual court integration.

Headnote:The matter involves a serious lapse by police and prison officials in failing to produce an incarcerated person before the court as required by law to address grievances. The court observed a lack of compliance with previous orders dated 03.02.2026, where officers filed simple affidavits instead of the mandated show-cause notices, demonstrating extreme casualness toward the life and liberty of a common man. The court framed the issue around the failure of administrative machinery to ensure the legal right of prisoners to be produced before courts. The ratio decidendi rests on the principle that the right of an incarcerated person to be heard cannot be extinguished by administrative contingencies, and the court noted that such systemic failure is a Pan-India issue requiring a broader judicial remedy. By way of an extraordinary indulgence, the court permitted the officers to file fresh show-cause notices by 10.03.2026 and directed the impleading of DGPs, Prison Heads, and Registrar Generals of all State High Courts to address the systematic implementation of virtual courts for under-trial persons.

Table of Content
1. court's dissatisfaction with the failure of officers to comply with directions for filing a show-cause regarding the non-production of a prisoner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. granting of a final opportunity for officers to file revised show-cause notices and modality for future compliance. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. expansion of the case to a pan-india issue to ensure prison reform and utilization of virtual courts for under-trials. (Para 9 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. procedural scheduling and interim exemption of officers from personal appearance. (Para 16 , 17)

O R D E R

Heard Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General and Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General for the respondent/applicant-State of Maharashtra. The Court was informed that they are also appearing on behalf of the officers namely, Mr. Ashutosh Dumbare, Commissioner of Police, Thane Commissionerate, Maharashtra; Mr. P.J. Jagtap, Superintendent of Police, Kalyan Jail and Mr. C.R. Devkate, Additional Senior Jailor (Judicial), who are also present before the Court in terms of our previous order dated 03.02.2026.

2. In terms of the order dated 03.02.2026, the above-named officers have filed their affidavits.

3. Learned Solicitor General and learned Additional Solicitor General have addressed the Court. However, upon interaction with the above officers, we are not fully satisfied with the stand taken or the averments made in their affidavits.

4. Pausing here, we are also shocked by the conduct inasmuch as, when the order dated 03.02.2026 in no uncertain terms used the following terms with regard to the presence of the above officers “shall remain physically present with their show cause on the date fixed”, the officers instead of filing their show-cause, have filed just a simple affidavit.

5. At this juncture, on a query to the officers, as to whether, there was any misunderstanding of the order or they have not read the same, no satisfactory answer is forthcoming. We record that this is an indication of extreme casualness on the part of the officers in not filing a show-cause. Thus, on this short ground also, we could have rejected the affidavits and proceeded with issuing notice for contempt for violation of this Court’s order.

6. However, moving on, we find that lame excuses have been made for justifying what has happened. We find such excuses to be totally unacceptable for the reason that a common man’s right, that too a person who is incarcerated and is required under law to be produced before the Court so that he has an opportunity to tell the Court with regard to any grievance he may have during his period of incarceration, has been totally extinguished and the officers have shown it to be a trivial issue and taking the plea of being engaged/preoccupied with other administrative contingencies. We reject such explanation outright.

7. At this juncture, learned Additional Solicitor General submitted that he may be permitted to unconditionally withdraw the affidavits and one last opportunity be given to the above officers to file an appropriate show-cause as per the order dated 03.02.2026 passed by this Court.

8. Mr. Ashutosh Dumbare, Commissioner of Police, Thane, has unconditionally apologised for his conduct and sought to be pardoned for not filing a show-cause. He also submitted that he may be given another opportunity to file his show-cause. The stand of the other two officers is also the same.

9. The matter being of a serious nature, which is borne out from the order dated 02.12.2025, cannot be under-estimated. It has shocked the conscious of this Court. We are also of the opinion that this is not a localised situation, but rather a Pan-India situation, which the Court is inclined to address in these proceedings for the larger public benefit especially, when it relates to the life and liberty of a common man.

10. Accordingly, by way of an extraordinary indulgence, the affidavits filed by the above officers shall not be taken into

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top