ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10801-

10802/2024 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-12-2023 in AFO No. 241/2023 22-12-2023 in IA No. 3346/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay]

M/S. SIDDHI REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS Petitioner(s)

VERSUS VINOD DHANAJI BHOIR & ORS. Respondent(s)

IA No. 93088/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT

IA No. 93090/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

IA No. 102408/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES Date : 23-02-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Shreeyash Uday Lalit, Adv.

Mr. Nikhil Dilip Waje, Adv.

Mr. Himanshu Vats, Adv.

Mr. Angad Pahel, Adv. Mr. Lavam Tyagi, Adv.

Ms. Ishita Khurana, Adv.

Mr. Aviral Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Ishaan George, AOR For Respondent(s) :Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv.

Mr. Sangramsingh R. Bhonsle, AOR Mr. Zubin Dash, Adv.

Mr. Nrupal A. Dingankar, Adv. Ms. Pushkara A. Bhonsle, Adv.

Mrs. Sneha S. Bhonsle, Adv.

Mr. Naman Sherstra, Adv.

Mr. Sanmitra Y. Pol, Adv.

Signa ture No t Ve rifi ed UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following Digita lly s ign ed b y O R D E R KAPIL TANDON Date: 2026.02.27 Reason:

1. These Special Leave Petitions are against the judgment and order dated 22.12.2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal from order No. 241/2023 with IA No. 3346 of 2023 with Appeal from order No. 444/2023 with Appeal from Order (ST/)

No. 10020 of 2023 with IA No. 7975/2023.

2. As an interim measure the High Court directed as under:

"1] The Appeal From Order (St.) No.10020 OF

2023 filed by the plaintiffs stands dismissed.

2] The Appeal From Order No. 241 of 2023 filed by defendant No. 1/appellant and Appeal From Order No. 444 of 2023 filed by defendant No.

2/appellant are partly allowed.

3) The impugned order restraining the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 from creating third party interest in the suit properties, stands quashed and set aside subject to the following conditions:

(i) The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 shall furnish a bank guarantee of a nationalized bank in the sum of Rs. 21 Crores to the satisfaction of the trial Court, within a period of two months.

(ii) Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 shall shall not claim any equities on account of development and creation of third party interests in the suit property.

(iii) The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 shall also file an undertaking before the trial Court to the effect that they will make a specific disclosure to the prospective transferees about the pendency of the suit and the orders passed therein, including this order.

4] It is clarified that in the event of default to fulfill the above conditions, within the aforesaid period, this order shall stand vacated and the order passed by the trial Court shall continue to operate till the disposal of the suit.

5] By way of abundant caution, it is further clarified that till the fulfillment of all the above conditions, the impugned order shall continue to operate.

6] The hearing of suit stands expedited

7] The parties shall bear their respective costs."

3. Having heard Mr. Shreeyash Uday Lalit, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Ninad Laud, learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s), we are of the opinion that interest of justice will be subserved by modifying the condition no. 3(i) passed by the High Court and direct the petitioner not to sell or create encumbrances over the Flat Nos. 103, 203, 1103, 1108 and 1208 of the Project High Land Springs, Wing D, Dhokali, Thane pending disposal of the Civil Suit.

4. The order of the High Court is modified only to the extent indicated while keeping rest of the order intact.

5. With these observations and the Special Leave Petition are disposed of.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (KAPIL TANDON) (MANOJ KUMAR)

COURT MASTER (SH) COU